<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Can Now Better Index Flash Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, SEO (Search Engine Optimization), Pay-Per-Click, Google Adwords &#38; Social Media - Full Service SEM Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 01:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick from webmaster forum</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick from webmaster forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>This is great news. I always stayed away from flash completely, for SEO reasons. I agree with everyone else that it should be very limited for users sake, but adding a little flash can sure spice up a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news. I always stayed away from flash completely, for SEO reasons. I agree with everyone else that it should be very limited for users sake, but adding a little flash can sure spice up a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>Rye, that&#039;s why I think that a site that is completely in flash should also have a HTML version of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rye, that&#8217;s why I think that a site that is completely in flash should also have a HTML version of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckata</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>ckata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>Hey Ron!
Well - Adobe actually did. They produced the API which is allowing Google to index the contents of the Flash files. Yahoo apparently is supporting it as well. I suspect MS will come along shortly too!

Cheers,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ron!<br />
Well &#8211; Adobe actually did. They produced the API which is allowing Google to index the contents of the Flash files. Yahoo apparently is supporting it as well. I suspect MS will come along shortly too!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron X Jansen</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron X Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>@&#039;business networking
I agree. I&#039;m having the same &#039;problem&#039;. I&#039;m looking forward to see the first real meaningfull results in the Google SERP&#039;s.

Text in mine SWF files is still not indexed.

Of topic: why didn&#039;t Adobe developed this feature? It seems to me a huge opening in the market: selling the possibility to get your flash site indexed by Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@&#8217;business networking<br />
I agree. I&#8217;m having the same &#8216;problem&#8217;. I&#8217;m looking forward to see the first real meaningfull results in the Google SERP&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Text in mine SWF files is still not indexed.</p>
<p>Of topic: why didn&#8217;t Adobe developed this feature? It seems to me a huge opening in the market: selling the possibility to get your flash site indexed by Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t trust that if I was you.  My site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schmoozii.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Schmoozii&lt;/a&gt;, had a javascript redirect on the landing page.  Google says they can crawl javascript, but when their bots came it they couldn&#039;t.  I had a robots.txt and sitemap on the page telling the bot what to do and it just couldn&#039;t do it.  When I removed the javascript redirect it crawled the next day.  Also, none of the other search engines could crawl the site.

If you want your site to be SEO friendly, I wouldn&#039;t recommend putting flash or javascript on the homepage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t trust that if I was you.  My site, <a href="http://www.schmoozii.com" rel="nofollow">Schmoozii</a>, had a javascript redirect on the landing page.  Google says they can crawl javascript, but when their bots came it they couldn&#8217;t.  I had a robots.txt and sitemap on the page telling the bot what to do and it just couldn&#8217;t do it.  When I removed the javascript redirect it crawled the next day.  Also, none of the other search engines could crawl the site.</p>
<p>If you want your site to be SEO friendly, I wouldn&#8217;t recommend putting flash or javascript on the homepage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rye McKeever</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rye McKeever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkinternetmarketing.com/blog/google-can-now-better-index-flash-content/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Google might index it, but I&#039;m still unlikely to stick around and watch most of it!

You&#039;re right...Use it sparingly.  Not only for SEO reasons, but because it generally stinks for the user who doesn&#039;t really need cool flash as much as s/he needs informative/entertaining content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google might index it, but I&#8217;m still unlikely to stick around and watch most of it!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230;Use it sparingly.  Not only for SEO reasons, but because it generally stinks for the user who doesn&#8217;t really need cool flash as much as s/he needs informative/entertaining content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

